this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
219 points (98.2% liked)

politics

30141 readers
1928 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The DNC official platform document says it wants to:

  1. Tax the Rich
  2. Remove citizens united
  3. Make voting easier
  4. Prevent climate disaster
  5. Protect forests
  6. Give everyone food and medical and expand affordable housing and transport

So, I mean, they understand what I am angry about. Only policy I wish they were better about would be dropping support of Israel but even on that they are infinitely better than GOP policy.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think you are exagerating the platform quite a bit, or just seeing what you want to.

https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2024-Democratic-Party-Platform.pdf

  • It says get to a fair tax code where the rich pay their share, and they equate it directly to taxxing them as much as the lower class is taxed. Thats barely "tax the rich" at all.

  • It never mentions citizens united anywhere in their platform.

  • It doesnt talk about making voting easier. It rambles on kissing Bidens arse a lot and then talks about restoring voting rights Trump took away.

  • I give the dems a "c" on climate change. They talk about a few specifics, after talking about energy independence and jobs. And once again, the whole party platform is written to emphasize Bidens weak-ass contributions and paint him as transformative.

  • Do a search on forests. Where are they promising to work on forests in there?

  • It doesnt specify food or medical care for all anywhere. Biden was never in favor of medicare for all, and neither is the DNC. They want to slightly expand medicaid by giving states slightly more funding, and offer "'affordable" care to all via Obamacare. Letting people buy in a marketplace is not the same as giving everyone medical care, and your shortening it to that wildly oversells what the platform doc says.

And it doesnt talk about giving everyone food. I dont know where you got that from.

[–] goferking0 2 points 1 day ago

And it doesnt talk about giving everyone food. I dont know where you got that from.

FYI all that account does is make up things to make dems look better

[–] goferking0 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actions speak louder than words. They're happy to say they will do things that they have no intention of actually following through on while just doing a slightly less terrible version of a republican policy.

I wish they were better about would be dropping support of Israel but even on that they are infinitely better than GOP policy.

Curious about what you think the difference is?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fun fact, the DNC have had 48 or less senators for over 13 years, but I agree that the many social, foreign affairs, and fiscal accomplishments of the DNC go vastly underreported.

[–] goferking0 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish they were better about would be dropping support of Israel but even on that they are infinitely better than GOP policy.

Curious about what you think the difference is?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Vote records where GOP show up as a monolith for Israel while the DNC does not.

  2. Biden admin officials saying peace is the goal. Pete Hegseth making an official statement that "death or exodus" is the goal. Large bombs withheld by the Biden Admin were deliveres under Trump according to Trump, and tanks enterred West Bank for the first time in decades.

  3. Countless charts like this:

Z9ee8nM3yXxeJ98.png

[–] goferking0 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for providing evidence you only care about optics and still think Biden did anything to slow or oppose the genocide.

Also weird you are using a chart that isn't accurate.

https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/2/18/gaza-death-toll-exceeds-75000-as-independent-data-verify-loss

The Gaza Mortality Survey (GMS), a population-representative household study published in The Lancet Global Health, estimated 75,200 “violent deaths” between October 7, 2023 and January 5, 2025. This figure represents approximately 3.4 percent of Gaza’s pre-conflict 2.2 million population and sits 34.7 percent higher than the 49,090 “violent deaths” reported by the MoH for the same period.

The Gaza Health Ministry estimates that as of February 16, at least 72,063 people have been killed since the start of the war. Of those, 603 people have been killed since the declaration of a “ceasefire” in the Gaza Strip on October 10, 2025.

Israel has consistently questioned the ministry’s figures, but an Israeli army official told journalists in the country in January that the army accepted that about 70,000 people had been killed in Gaza during the war.

Or even the people in Biden administrations flat out saying it https://www.npr.org/2025/08/28/nx-s1-5515620/israel-gaza-biden-famine

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What they told was a story of strong, sometimes bitter arguments within the administration on how far the U.S. was willing to go to pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to allow more aid into Gaza. U.S. officials were left frustrated by hours-long, heated exchanges with their Israeli counterparts.

Thank you for supporting my argument? Not sure why you would link that when it directly opposes your statements.

[–] goferking0 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it shows Biden doing absolutely nothing

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except for the countless hours of trying to force aid past Israeli resistance, and demonstrably accomplishing much more aid than under the GOP, aside from those they're exactly the same.

[–] goferking0 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again showing all you care about is optics not action. Biden could have stopped it immediately but didn't because he cares more about Israel than stopping a genocide.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry that you hate Palestinians so much and wish death by starvation upon them.

For a so called antizionist you seem to have more in common with Israel than different.

[–] goferking0 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think they weren't starving under Biden?

[–] goferking0 2 points 1 day ago

Really not helping the case of they want to things with how poorly they campaign.

Also the DNC is just the organization to get people elected not anything in charge of policy so of course it would not have any of those.