this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
246 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2208 readers
1080 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

By that logic you also can't pretend Israel had no reason to attack Iran, given that Hamas is Iran's proxy and Hamas attacked Israel.

Or maybe we shouldn't go back to pre-WWI logic and think that all conflicts are exactly the same and every conflict is automatically justified by flimsy reasoning. That kind of logic didn't work out so well in the past, see WWI.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Or that Hamas is justified to attack Israel since israel attacked Palestinian first. And is killing them since at least 20 years. This kind of logic can be used in all directions too. When you look into it it is always the Epstein class and it is equivalent in each country the issue. These fucker always decided to burn the world instead of sharing their just share.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Israel was justified in Attacking Egypt and Jordan (the countries that previously occupied Palestine) because they attacked Israel. Do we continue on until we get back to whichever caveman thtrew a stone at another cavemen?

Or maybe we should accept the more modern sensibilities that all wars are bad, escalating wars is bad, "moral justification" for war is stupid because war is never a moral act.