this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
326 points (98.5% liked)

PC Gaming

14892 readers
552 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm fine with AI use in the back end, nobody really codes without something along the lines of copilot or claude anymore anyway. But any art related asset (in terms of the writing, visuals or audio) needs to be human made.

If you're comfortable leaving what should be deliberate artistic choices to some logic machine, i'm not interested in putting time the world you're building.

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm fine with AI use in the back end, nobody really codes without something along the lines of copilot or claude anymore anyway.

Well that's just straight up untrue. My org did an AI pilot to see if it was something we wanted to invest in and it ended up coming back with reduced productivity among devs (largely due to a massive increase in debugging time because of the slop output from the AI). Our devs write good code, faster, without the AI involved.

It's mostly in management where we've seen productivity increases, because of how many emails they are writing on the average day and for transcription of meetings.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Heck, it is objectively measured by a LLM adjacent seller like Faros AI.

The more LLM code in your company, the slower delivery and more bugs that you likely find on production.

Literally data is at 60% of daily tasks being LLM assisted, the throughput is (every value is an average) 500% slower, company delivers 10% less and the bug rate is +50% per PR and +250% production incidents.

At 40% of daily task being LLM assisted the bug rate was +9% vs pre-LLM.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's what's crazy.

Some indie dev was like, "Yeah I used AI to help me learn Godot" and suddenly there's a dozen negative reviews about how his game uses AI.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Nuance is a word that doesn't exist in some people's dictionary, unfortunately.