this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
326 points (98.5% liked)

PC Gaming

14892 readers
450 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
326
Data analyst finds 'AI stigma' on Steam can reduce the number of reviews a game gets by around 53%—and the reviews it does get are more negative (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 day ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
85 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm fine with AI use in the back end, nobody really codes without something along the lines of copilot or claude anymore anyway.

Well that's just straight up untrue. My org did an AI pilot to see if it was something we wanted to invest in and it ended up coming back with reduced productivity among devs (largely due to a massive increase in debugging time because of the slop output from the AI). Our devs write good code, faster, without the AI involved.

It's mostly in management where we've seen productivity increases, because of how many emails they are writing on the average day and for transcription of meetings.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Heck, it is objectively measured by a LLM adjacent seller like Faros AI.

The more LLM code in your company, the slower delivery and more bugs that you likely find on production.

Literally data is at 60% of daily tasks being LLM assisted, the throughput is (every value is an average) 500% slower, company delivers 10% less and the bug rate is +50% per PR and +250% production incidents.

At 40% of daily task being LLM assisted the bug rate was +9% vs pre-LLM.