this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4730 readers
175 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I made an extension that bypasses online age verification

To show my stance towards online age verification, I made a small (literally, less than 10 kilobytes) add-on that will completely skip ageverif.net's verification prompt. (Only that site (for now?))

With more and more data breaches going on it's important to protect yourself by not sharing unnecessary data, and to show how broken some age verification platforms are!

It's #opensource too! https://github.com/helloyanis/agechecker.net-bypass (more info on why I do it is in the readme)

By Developer @helloyanis@furries.club

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's funny how the UNIX epoch and my DOB happen to be the same. I wonder how many other people were "born" on 1/1/1970?

[–] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It was a busy day in all the maternity wards

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 14 points 5 days ago (5 children)
[–] cm0002@toast.ooo 4 points 5 days ago

Oh hey look! Fellow new years baby!

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I wanted to say "19700101000000" but wanted to be clear for those not in the habit of reading timestamps formatted the way they were back then (although the "19" was usually left off) for easy comparison. Should've thought to put it the way you did.

[–] DrWorm@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago

1970-01-01 00:00:00+00:00

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

We should all mean this. Truly the logically dominant date format.