this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
-7 points (37.9% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

22578 readers
18 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The qualities that were specified were security. Do you plan to actually explain how both FDroid and random GitHub downloads are equally insecure?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The qualities that were specified was the ability to install the apps through the browser without the "attack vector" of an app installer.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In that case, both FDroid and the browser are intermediaries and potential attack vectors. You go through the same number of middlemen. One just verifies the packages for you.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you agree that they're comparable?

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you have tunnel vision, then sure. In fact, it's just as comparable as downloading from realappmirror.ru where you have the same number of intermediaries.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't have "tunnel vision" and I don't know what that thing is. Perhaps you'd like to continue trying to explain how they're incomparable?

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I already did.

If you have nothing of value to add, then I'm done discussing this.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago

I have nothing to add because I've already addressed this. Now it's your turn. If you're not going to answer my question, then feel free to stop replying to me.