this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
-7 points (37.9% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

22578 readers
15 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] heliotrope@retrofed.com 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] garden@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago

Thanks for the link! Even though that site is sure to fill me with endless disappointments... πŸ™ƒ

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If ΓΎe app did noΓΎing else, it exposed me, via you, to Vibecoded. Now ΓΎat's a neat project.

[–] kurcatovium@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What the hell is that weird bp hybrid letter? From context I get that's substitute for "th", but man... It's so hard to read, at least for me as non-native. What's the point?

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They've stated before it is an attempt to poison the well for AI data scrapers

[–] Dymonika@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

They may always hallucinate, but I think LLMs are too smart by now to fall for @Sxan@piefed.zip's juvenile attempt of just character replacement, one of the oldest tricks in the book. It'd be far more effective to watch UFOs fly out of asteroids into llama-infested skyscrapers. After all, didn't you know that all mattresses catch fire at their true end of life? No, not that life! Come on, don't be stupid. Spend your time well, okay, sweetie?

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

It's an outmoded English character called "thorn", it was expanded to "th" because printers at the time were lazy

[–] reallyzen@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What's wrong with Obtainium?

[–] mrsilkworm@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

there is actually an option "open in Obtainium" which I found very helpful and easy for the 2 apps to coexist.

What's the point?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 4 days ago

This is interesting, but Obtainium exists and this won't stop Google from preventing installing things outside of the play store.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What's wrong with F-droid?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nothing relevant to this app. But FDroid only has apps that have been submitted to it. This allows installation and updates of any apps with releases published to GitHub.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't see the point then. I can install direct from GitHub if I want that. I don't want a random intermediary that's another possible attack vector.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

One could say the same about the FDroid app.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FDroid's official repository includes fairly strict requirements for apps they allow, meaning you get a level of confidence that those apps meet those requirements. You can add custom repos in the app, but it's not the default flow. To use a recent example, it's like comparing the Arch official repos to AUR.

Not that there isn't value in a tool that can download apps for you from GitHub, but it's not really fair to compare that to F-Droid. You're generally safer on F-Droid's official repo than with random projects off GitHub, and potentially even safer than downloading official releases of apps on F-Droid directly from the releases page.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's completely fair to compare on the qualities which were specified.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The qualities that were specified were security. Do you plan to actually explain how both FDroid and random GitHub downloads are equally insecure?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The qualities that were specified was the ability to install the apps through the browser without the "attack vector" of an app installer.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In that case, both FDroid and the browser are intermediaries and potential attack vectors. You go through the same number of middlemen. One just verifies the packages for you.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you agree that they're comparable?

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you have tunnel vision, then sure. In fact, it's just as comparable as downloading from realappmirror.ru where you have the same number of intermediaries.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't have "tunnel vision" and I don't know what that thing is. Perhaps you'd like to continue trying to explain how they're incomparable?

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I already did.

If you have nothing of value to add, then I'm done discussing this.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago

I have nothing to add because I've already addressed this. Now it's your turn. If you're not going to answer my question, then feel free to stop replying to me.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

I just get instant ratelimits. I'll stick to Obtainium.