this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
305 points (96.6% liked)

Games

49254 readers
1265 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

> sell the company to playstation

> stop updating or supporting your most successful game

> ???

> layoff your developers

> profit?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Unfortunate that the union fought for them to the bitter end.

I want unions back and I'm a software engineer. Looking more and more like a depression hitting soon.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unions are awesome.

I'm working in the IT department of a heavily unionised non-IT company. The contracts the union negotiates with that company (and others in the same sector) apply to all employees in those companies, including those who aren't themselves union members.

I gotta say, pay might be better elsewhere, but I don't have to fight for a yearly salary increase. I also don't worry about being sick. I don't worry about performance, because they're not allowed to monitor it. I don't worry about getting everything done in time either. If I'm overworked, I tell my boss and he has to see about reducing my load. Sure, might just be a good boss, but I'm pretty sure it's also a workplace culture resulting from knowing we can't be fired without good reason, and poor performance isn't one (and might also land you in trouble for monitoring performance).

Many of my coworkers have been there for 20+ years, through ups and downs and management changes and structural changes and all. It's a good, reliable employer, and a solid union helps keep it that way.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Union benefits shouldn't be given to non-members.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Idk, isn't arranging different employment contracts for members and non-members kinda difficult? You'd have to set up a new contract when someone joins or leaves the union.

To be clear, the overarching part the union is responsible for is a framework agreement defining paygrades, holidays and such for all the employees in the sector.

I fudged and conflated the workers' council with the union, because ultimately, they have similar objectives in protecting workers and my point was to emphasise that good worker representation makes for a stable and pleasant enough working environment.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let non-members represent themselves during contract negotiations, or be represented by the union if they are a member. The problem with non-members getting the same benefits as members is that there's no motivation to be a member in the first place, which means the union has less funds and less negotiating power.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

I mean, there's no real individual contract negotiation. The conditions are standardised by the framework agreement. They use a standard format where they note what pay class you're paid by according to that agreement and that's that.

I understand the desire and reasoning to separate into "deserves the benefits of our negotiaton" and "doesn't support us, doesn't get anything". For my employer, the potential advantage of individual contracts doesn't seem to offset the added effort, so they just throw the rest in with the majority.

As for negotiating power, last time they announced a one-day warning strike after a round of negotiations failed, our CEO was quick to pay out a lump sum to everyone and assure us that they're committed to finding a fair solution and all. Allegedly, he wasn't actually opposed to the union's proposition, but as I said, it's sector-wide so other employers have to agree as well and apparently didn't. Still, that even the threat produced a reaction (and there was no full strike after it either) indicates that the union has plenty of power.

I think many of us are aware that, member or not, we wouldn't have these benefits if we didn't have the union and just sign up on principle. Most of the sector is blue-collar, and I assume that a majority of them are indeed members.

My wife is a nurse at a hospital that is currently in the middle of a union push. It's crazy how much effort they are putting in to try and get the vote to fail. Spending money on fliers and suddenly having money to buy the staff lunch all the time. She was told " if we unionize it will be harder for management to help you !" Meanwhile every time she asks management for anything "I'm busy".