this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
140 points (97.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

42653 readers
696 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
SuperEars@lemmy.world
140
It is pretty cool how easy the internet and personal computers have made it to communicate with encryption (piefed.social)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by DeckPacker@piefed.social to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The internet is mostly known for being a nightmare for your privacy, but I also think there is another side to that coin. I mean, it is insanely easy (and common) these days to do all your internet communication with messengers, that have pretty much unbreakable encryption (Signal). That was not possible for the average person before computers and the internet. The government could easily read all you private letters.

Also, all our web traffic is fully encrypted with https (although that is more of a security than a privacy thing) and most modern phones automatically do full disk encryption for your files. It is also trivialilly easy to use a proper end to end encrypted cloud storage (proton, tuta etc.) or even use unsafe cloud storage like Google Drive as long as you encrypt your files locally before uploading.

I know, the internet is still a net negative for most peoples privacy, but it is pretty cool how far we've come with encryption.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Or even just pick up a phone because wiretaps require a warrant.

Oh, my sweet summer-child.
Your local police may need a warrant for a wiretap, but do you think intelligence services care about that? Let alone foreign ones?

Legal requirements don't stop the really problematic entities from spying on you. Privacw was easier back in the day, because it required effort and manpower to surveil you.
Nowadays, an automated computer program can do it.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It didn't matter. The government has limited money for that shit. They couldn't even spy on everything they wanted to, much less the general population.

Privacw was easier back in the day, because it required effort and manpower to surveil you. Nowadays, an automated computer program can do it.

There you go, making my point for me. That program wouldn't be possible without the internet. So encryption became needed by us nobodies because of the internet.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

Well, yes. I'm not arguing against your general idea. Just the notion that laws would protect you.

But strictly speaking, the internet isn't a requirement for automated mass surveillance. Powerful enough computers to analyze and process our phone calls would have sufficed. The internet just happened to predate those.

And yes, it's always also a matter of ressources. But if you rely on that, your privacy depends on the assumption, that you're just not interesting enough to be surveilled. Since you had no way to verify that, relying on that notion is somewhat similar to the "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" argument today and yields the protection of your privacy to the decisions of the surveillant.