this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
677 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85746 readers
3536 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 102 points 20 hours ago (4 children)
[–] scops@reddthat.com 68 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine paying for ads...

This is one of those headlines for a problem I had no idea existed

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Use to be a problem on TV too. The same type of laws regulate tv ads.

And they are still too loud

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

TV ads are acceptable, they are strictly limited to -24 LUFS. Streaming media like YouTube enforces -14 LUFS.

That's 10 decibels, it's twice as loud.

And that's just the hard cutoff.
While YouTube will bring down the volume automatically (say, if you upload something with -9 LUFS, it will bring it down to -14), it doesn't scale up.
So maybe a conscious creator is uploading at -24, then BOOM ad at -14 and your ears start to bleed.

This law aims to fix that, by forcing the ads to be at the same volume of the content that's playing, instead of just being able to blast at full volume.

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago

TV ads are not acceptable. that -24 limit is pretty useless if the program you were watching is quiet so you turned up the volume. Besides, even if this weren't an issue, no targeted ad is acceptable.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 14 hours ago

Sincerely. I refuse to comprehend some people.

[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 9 points 17 hours ago
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Me every year at super bowl time: ❔

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I still don't get the people who say they are going to watch the Super Bowl for the ads, then the day after the game they're bitching about how terrible the ads were.

I'm like... yeah... they are ads....

Admittedly back in the .com days there were some good ones.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 3 points 12 hours ago

I mean, you kinda answered your own question there. They USED TO be entertaining.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I miss when ads were fun and you'd watch the superbowl to see the new California raisins animation and Michael Jackson video.

Smooth Criminal was amazing the first time it aired. Still great, but the long video blew us away.