this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
520 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85833 readers
3522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
520
Ford hired AI and sacked humans. It backfired badly (www.the-independent.com)
submitted 1 day ago by FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Ford has admitted to rehiring hundreds of human workers after its aggressive AI adoption strategy backfired.

The US automaker hired over 350 veteran engineers, referred to internally as “gray beards”, over the past three years in order to address mistakes made by automated systems.

The staff will lead quality reviews after the automation issues cost the company billions of dollars, Bloomberg reported, while some workers will also help improve and train the AI systems.

“We had been relying more and more on automated quality systems and not getting the desired results,” said Kumar Galhotra, Ford’s chief operating officer.

“We brought back technical specialists and they hunt for failure points before a part ever reaches the plant floor.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Billions? Fuck, they might need to get bailed out with taxpayers' money!

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Say what you will but Ford was the only one of the big three that didn’t take money directly. That isn’t to say they didn’t benefit from those programs however.

This move was still colossally stupid. They tried to save millions and costs themselves billions.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

This is a myth the internet will not let die. Ford did not take the Obama bailout because they didn't qualify, as they already took a huge bailout by Bush a year prior.

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

My link is to factcheck.org so if you have another link I’d be willing to read it.

Edit: I went searching for what you’re talking about around the 2007ish time period and I simply can’t find it. Everything is about TARP in 2008 which started with Bush and Ford didn’t take from. Ford did take a 5.9B loan from the Department of Energy in 2009. Looks like they did pay that loan back but have since taken another.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

It's not a myth, it's all public record. FORD got six billion in low-interest loans (at least, I didn't look up every year).

You can see for yourself at your leisure. Search "Ford bailout loans"

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They didn’t qualify because they weren’t struggling as badly, the F150 is the best selling truck in the world and domestic sales of the mustang and focus were their buoys. Not qualifying is a good thing… they didn’t need to take the bailout so they weren’t offered to

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Ford got six billion in low-interest loans with fantastic terms, that's a bailout