this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)
Vegan
3557 readers
4 users here now
An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.
Rules and miscellaneous:
- We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
- No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
- Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
- Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
- All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
congratulations you just explained why I basically said its not vegan in a traditional sense, and what OP is thinking about is closer to a sect in vegetarianism. unless you read my intitial post in a completely different way as I kind of explicitly said it isnt veganism.
It doesnt require a vegan to say what OP is saying is not vegan
your definition by the way isn't completely vegan either. as veganism includes not eating any byproduct of an animal, so milk and honey for example, are not vegan, despite it not necessarily doing physical pain and suffering to the animal.
the odd assumption you guys are making is you assumed i was talking about a commercial sense. do you not see the conclusions you automatically jumped to without me having not mentioned a single thing about farming involved in the situation.
unless you believe in the ghastly picture that male calves all roam wild with bolts on their head and knoves at their throat.
no ones defending commecialization farming of animals. not even myself.
I don't know why you cut out the other half of the sentence as it answers the rest of your post basically:
There is no ethical slavery no matter how "well" the slaves are treated. That's why even if it were possible to extract milk from a cow in a completely painless manner the fact that they are property is already at odds with being vegan.
As for your assertion that milk and honey don't cause physical pain and suffering to the animal
A bit more of a visual guide:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250403130922/https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/403444/dairy-industry-cow-life-milk-america
Or just straight up look at the gore yourself:
https://watchdominion.org/
This is exactly why I said that "you have no insight to offer" and "evidently don’t know the first thing about veganism". You have no idea how true that is because you don't even know what you dont know.
Done
Youre such a terrific moron, like the archetype of a carnist.
A: you refuse to read, here is what I wrote to address that
B: you have to insist on hypotheticals that are at best some edge cases but aren't really relevant to daily consumption.
Even if it were possible to extract milk painlessly (it isn't) and it were possible to do so in an ethical manner (another nonstarter) the fact is that this isn't happening. Why insist on arguing about something that isn't real, but some imagined world where you make the rules how you want? Arguing about spherical cows in a frictionless vacuum is not really relevant in our day-to-day lives.
C: you refuse to read the material you are being spoonfed.
It simply isn't possible to extract milk painlessly and the material I linked explains why. I'd like to see you argue how you would impregnate a cow, get rid of her baby so you can have the milk for yourself in a painless manner. Keeping in mind that being able to control her life in such a manner already is not vegan.
D: you don't consider what actual vegans say.
I already answered this here https://lemmy.ml/comment/21393729 and most other vegans seem to, more or less, agree.
not really. It's very easy "are the animals property or free?". When in doubt ask yourself "what if it were a human?" and there then is your answer.