Games

21342 readers

142 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
Mark spoilers
No bad mouthing sonic games here
No gamers allowed
No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review.
Can't read Colon Syntax Emoji? :skill-issue:

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

jack@hexbear.net

RiotDoll@hexbear.net

Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net

Acute_Engles@hexbear.net

Thordros@hexbear.net

abc@hexbear.net

"The 'AI Stigma' is real and severely punishes developers": A new study shows how much using AI in games hurts sales, and the numbers are hard to believe (www.windowscentral.com)

submitted 1 week ago by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's a different story for the more established studios with an existing following and previous titles. Game Oracle found that the use of AI by these studios resulted in a significant 40% to 60% drop in sales.

That's a huge difference. AI stigma seems to hit competent developers with a lot to lose the hardest, and I'm not sure that game studios are ready to accept it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BimboChristmas@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

We can't create things that don't have some basis in the reality we have processed with our sense organs. When we create a fictional character, they might be unlike any individual human we have met, but their traits are a composite of many different human experiences and traits that we have witnessed either externally to ourselves or internally.

Not saying you're wrong at all, but I find it funny that this is sooo close to one of Descartes proofs of God's existence in Meditations, that humans were able to conceive of "infinity" despite not being able to experience it directly.

I think Descartes was silly and wrong so I'm not really going anywhere with this, just read your post and found myself back in that PHIL101 classroom.