politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Obama didn't give us anything. We had Carter, Clinton, Obama, and Biden, and none them gave us any substantial health care plan at all. Obama came closest, with a Republican plan. He finally threw us a bone, and it was a Republican bone.
And then the Congressional Democrats gave it back.
This isn't even Mamdani's best quote,. I like this one:
Perfect.
Dudes like this reply above always show up to announce they want tens of millions of people thrown off healthcare, always an incredible sight.
A. "we grew a carrot"
B. "Okay but why stop there? Let's build a whole garden so everyone can eat!"
A. "Oh so you want the person we gave a carrot to to starve huh asshole?"
Wtf are you on about?
Check this comment thread, there are literally people calling the healthcare accomplishment we made a "Republican Plan".
You don't have to argue how the tens of millions of carrots aren't 340 million everytime somebody brings up how amaxing the accomplishment is. Nobody ever praised the carrots and opposed making more, that is a nonexistent stance. The only reason to criticize the limited scope of the carrots is to shame the DNC.
The DNC have accomplished good with every paultry majority they've scraped together and I'm sick of disingenuous assholes claiming otherwise.
Because it literally was. It was a version of Romneycare, that's part of why they couldn't repeal and replace, there's nothing they could replace it with cause it was their plan.
Shame is good. Shame is one of the few means we have of sending a message that their actions are unacceptable. They don't represent you or me, they represent their donors. And before you get on your high horse - yes I vote for these corrupt assholes, but I don't understand why we would be content with this. I don't understand why you're defending them. It's like Stockholm syndrome or something. Maybe if they actually stood for something they'd have more than a paltry majority. They can't even stand against genocide, like, for fucks sake that's the bare minimum. I think that's what's been so eye opening for so many recently.
Other countries aren't like this. Our country wasn't always like this. Things can be different. The system has been completely consumed by the interests of the wealthy and wealth inequality is higher than it's ever been.
Mandami talks about FDR style governing. The last time a Democrat tried that he got elected 4 times and ended up dying in office. Don't tell me thats unelectable.
We've had 48 or less DNC Senators for over 13 years. Shame has not worked at fucking all and is commonly disingenuous shame like yours refusing to admit they did something good.