this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
38 points (95.2% liked)
Programming
27564 readers
258 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Could you explain what feelings you have about AI, and how you see these feelings as opposing. If you are just uncertain about AI (holding no opposing views), I think you would want to research more. Maybe if we knew more about your teams at your work, and what is being developed. You could honestly just spend an hour a week working on standardizing coding agent availability and licensing/subscriptions, and leave it at that. Either they weren't looking for someone who was a machine learning engineer, or whoever promoted you is clueless to what AI actually means.
I suppose my views are predominantly that it's just kinda fine? I think it's naive to think that it has no value but also don't think it's going to be the end all be all of tech and once the hype train settles we'll probably have a medium similar to the dot com bubble bursting.
I'd say I'm somewhat familiar with llms in general; self hosting a few with llama-swap, testing harnesses, generally just testing its capabilities year after year. As for my teams we have our singular backend dev, singular mobile dev, and singular hardware engineer who hold up our platform and sold consumer devices and then the litany of customer facing staff.
Morbidly, I only got the job because their ai hype man contractor died and they decided "maybe we should look internally instead", but the general work he produced was a singular Claude vibed executive report.
Honestly, I'd sit down with the product folk(s) and see what their thoughts are. As devs, we generally decide how moreso than what. Ask what some pain points are.
My gut feeling when I hear about an AI contractor who makes a vibe coded executive report is pretty abysmal. It feels very snake oil salesman, but I think a lot of contractors*(like the subject matter expert types you bring in, not "non FTE" contractors)* are sort of like that just out of necessity. They need to market themselves as being useful moreso than actually being useful.
But that's pretty pessimistic. I wouldn't tell your coworkers that (unless they also seem to have the same impression lol). Executive reports are useful for marketing. Does your business need to market itself? Sort of the inverse snake oil salesman maneuver lol. I'll give an example,
My company does some cyber security stuff. Along with the product that provides a way to monitor, we offer a team that monitors as well. One issue brought up at our last quarterly planning was that many clients have difficulty understanding the value of our product. An example was that one person said "well y'all aren't sending us any alerts, the last folks sent us a lot. What are you even doing?" Well, it turns out the answer is that we filter many false negatives out so they don't even end up in any sort of review queue. But they don't see that, they just see queues with little to nothing. So a goal was to get a nice executive report dashboard that showed this information in a way that's easy to understand. That way if some, perhaps aloof, executive gets the idea that "we don't get any alerts to review," they'll also have some tool that very easily shows them "of X alerts fired, Y% were deemed false positives by our team, Z remaining went into the queue."
Now, none of that is AI necessarily, but it's also something that I as a dev would never really think of. At least where I have worked. I don't work very closely with customers, and when I do they are often "internal customers" who I can be more informal with.
I'll just second what multiple others have said as a footnote, but do try to be aware of costs. Tracking AI costs should be something you try to do early. Like others have said, AI is heavily subsidized by investors right now. That's just the way out economy works. People get an idea, build it, woo investors, and then focus on growth instead of profitability. As long as they can convince investors, they don't need to be profitable. Once they can't convince more, they have to look into an IPO and/or becoming profitable. That's basically where we are now. I think I seen the phrase "tokenpocalypse" used.
Who knows, maybe two years from now we'll look at this AI craze the way we look at the NFT craze from a few years ago.
Congrats on the promotion though. Trust your instincts. Be honest. I think even being candid about your reservations with AI is wise.
Ahh sounds like you had a sort of ad block problem! Turn on an ad block, client doesn't see any ads and then starts thinking "well maybe there just aren't ads and you're not doing anything" so you add a counter to show how many ads are blocked c:
Your gut feeling is the exact same I had when I was reading the report, abysmal. Then I realized it was hosted on the internet without any auth to access the report and that feeling just got worse.
From the very get go I tried to curb their expectations and be wary of spend because of the heavy token subsidation at the moment that's expected to increase especially with the IPOs later this year. At the moment I think I'm going to treat this as a way to introduce systems I thought we needed and have the ability to increase spending to do so, including spending on AI if I think it would be worth while.
Thanks for your input c: