this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
749 points (98.8% liked)
Not The Onion
21885 readers
1005 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Funny thing is that they end up dressing and styling in a similar manner while looking down on people who deviate from the unspoken dress code. By rejecting fashion they are making a conscious choice in the way they dress and are therefore participating in fashion.
Same thing with the "punk rock" look. It's so not punk.
An aesthetic drawn from an ethic is the most authentic aesthetic possible
Sure, but if they all end up looking similar to each other it's still another form of fashion just not mainstream fashion. They are still signaling, consciously or subconsciously, that they are part of the in-group they want to associate with by the way they carry and dress themselves. It's no different from what the Chads and Stacys, who they think are superficial, do.
The difference is the ethic. Or lack thereof.
I'm not sure I know this use of the term ethic, but it sounds interesting. Care to define or illuminate?
Punks that dress in patched clothes do so because they don't want to support the industry of sweat shops, exploited labor, and fast fashion. They'd rather buy something used and patch it forever.
That's an example of an aesthetic that comes from an ethic.
Okay but how is a smelly nerd who buys Pokemon tshirts more ethical than a Stacy who buys clothing from Nordstrom they both participate in the same consooming behavior, pleasing their corporate overlords.
I don't think either of those are lead by an ethic, and therefore they are both equally terrible