this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
438 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85964 readers
4042 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It really sucks, but unless someone was to come up with a way to cram massive amounts of a game onto single discs, or no more than two, it was inevitable. That's not why they're doing it, but still

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
  1. Final Fantasy VII releases on 3 discs. It was a huge sucsess.

PS1 discs contained 700mb per disc.

Blurays I think are 25gb, but with different burning options should be able to store up to 75gb per disc.

This means a game would need to exceed 225gb to go beyond 3 discs.

Why would that be an issue? Most games can fit on 1 disc. Maybe 2. Rarely 3. I can't think of a game that would need 4.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

A 128GB blu ray should be sufficient for basically any game

Up to 256GB over two disks should be more than enough

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Hey now, I was fine with my 7 disc copy of Wing Commander 4. I'll be good with it again.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They could just use a flash drive to distribute the game. Copy the game to the local drive...and wait, that's how PC gaming works.

The appeal of CDs, or game cartridges, was the ability to load a game and immediately start playing (well after the loading screen as everything loaded into ram) and you could play the game on other consoles (bring game to friend or resell it). To recreate that, most games would have to be shipped on a 256gb ssd so the game can just load from that on any computer. I have a feeling that's not the best business strategy right now

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Flash has a limited data retention time. With high capacity QLC flash, that time can be very short.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, flash certainly wouldn't work for actually running the game, but it would work great for a 1 time distribution/transfer method to the game to a pic/console's drive.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago

The main reason for wanting a physical copy is so you can sell it when you are done with it. If the data degrades after a couple of years, it doesn't do much good. A pressed disc will last for decades when taken care of.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago

The technology exists but it's not available to consumers.