this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
383 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
86046 readers
3494 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Meanwhile China already has data centers in the ocean. Almost anything they do you can bet it's a good idea [economically] because they're not at the point to where they can waste billions and still come out on top like the US has done for decades.
Microsoft experimented with oceanic data centers too, and I don't believe they actually abandoned that project either. It's just Musk and his ilk are very loud and outsized loudness has a tendency to dominate public discourse.
It was concluded in 2024. MS called it a success but also discontinued research and expansion for reasons that don't seem clear from what I can find.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Natick
Oh, shame to read that. It sounded like it had real potential.
Data centers on floating barges (or submerged just below the surface) makes so much more sense.
You're still just heating the water.
https://slrpnk.net/post/39802801
True. But that's unavoidable ... assuming you're dead set on having datacenters. Datacenters are always going to produce heat, and that heat has to go somewhere.
Better to just not build the data centers