this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
181 points (91.3% liked)

Flippanarchy

2585 readers
91 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally - and a lot of other anarchists do as well - I make a distinction between a government and a state. A government is any kind of collective organized decision-making, while a state is something more specific; an organization that enforces a hierarchy on a population without their consent by maintaining a monopoly on violence. In effect a state is an extreme concentration of power that both coerces and requires the participation of an entire population.

The anarchy that I envision isn't simply the abolition of the state, but its replacement with a non-hierarchical, horizontal form of government, which would also require - but not coerce - the participation of an entire population. There are many forms such a system can take, and there are some examples in today's world that show a glimpse of how such a system could look, like the autonomous region of north and east Syria (AANES or Rojava) which is practicing what they call Democratic Confederalism, or the Zapatistas in Chiapas Mexico with their federated local autonomous governments. There are also less totalizing organizations that practice horizontal decision-making and which could perform the various functions of government, and occasionally do in situations where the state is slow or fails to respond such as natural disasters or when a community is a victim of violence perpetrated by a state where no other state intervenes. Organized decentralized power is capable of countering, disbanding, and even preventing the concentration of centralized power.

I agree, but at the end of the day every human being has the power of coercion through violence. There will always be individuals who will seek to do violence, to break the "laws" in whatever form your collective makes them: assault, murder, rape. There must be power to coerce violent individuals away from violence.

Whatever organization you devise, run a thought experiment to test it: imagine a clever, charismatic, amoral sociopath, hungry for power and willing to do anything to achieve it. If no position of power exists to seize, they will create one for themselves. They'll blackmail people, threaten them, even kill them. They'll surround themselves with thugs to assault and threaten people. They'll create a criminal empire. How does your system prevent such tyrants?

It's not enough to have a government which itself isn't oppressive, it must be able to prevent ambitious sociopaths from becoming oppressors. Otherwise you're just in a lull between tyrants. Violence can never be eliminated, ultimately it must be restrained by the threatening presence of superior violence. Ideally the presence alone is sufficient deterrent, but without any deterrent you're constantly at risk of ambitious sociopaths