this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
91 points (84.7% liked)

PC Master Race

21616 readers
634 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well they don't always, but you can just use multiple discs in that case. I think final fantasy has done this as well as a recent example, but this has already been done since the days of games still being on CD.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It’s significantly more expensive than simply having the rest be downloaded via an update.

With developers going under left right and centre, putting an even higher cost on their production is a death sentence.

[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That's not because of the discs lol. If you afford to spend 300 million on slop like concord, you can print discs. And a franchise like gta 6 can definitely afford them.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It is because of discs, actually. Every single extra dollar it costs to manufacture them is like 5% of the revenue from the sale of the game that the publisher loses out on. That’s huge.

[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure they'll be fine compared to the 30% that sony/steam takes.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

So because they already lose 30%, they can afford to lose another 5%?