this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)

Space

2524 readers
205 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

..."Once you have super-conducting technology available in space, you can then create very strong magnetic fields and you can use them for various use cases," he said. "You can accelerate things in space very fast or change the trajectory of a satellite completely without fuel."...

"When we go to space, we get hurt by radiation, and these superconducting magnets can create umbrellas of magnetic fields around the spacecraft to protect the interior," said Arshavsky. "So we can shield people in space from that radiation."...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Is there a limit to the amount of thrust that these superconducting magnets could generate in Earth's magnetic field? I read a hypothesis that the UAPs that have been observed to accelerate without any propellent are using superconductors in this way.

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A magnet that strong would be easily detected by human technology

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Don't UFOs often come with a "my stuff started going haywire" type of thing? Are we monitoring the atmosphere for transient localized magnetic anomalies?

I'm pretty sure weather services and the military measure stuff like that. If UAPs were as common as the believers think, there would have been actual evidence by now.

[–] giacomo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

it makes the most sense, right?