this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
212 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

86159 readers
3707 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

the AI Safety Measures Act creates a framework that will require the “developers of the largest advanced AI systems” (read: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.) to provide public disclosures as to their safety practices, report any significant safety incidents, and remain in line with a set of compliance processes. It also creates a channel for whistleblowers working inside AI labs to safely and securely relay any safety concerns they might have without fear of repercussions.

Whoa this sounds pretty serious. It asks these companies to self report safety incidents and creates a "channel" for whistleblowers.

That's some serious hammer dropping. 🙄

OpenAI and Anthropic both endorsed the bill as it moved through the legislature

Of course they did because this is just the Democratic version of what Republicans do with regulatory capture. They just like to dress their version up with a facade of "consumer protections" when the law doesn't actually protect anyone or improve anything.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That requirement will apply to any AI company reporting more than $500 million in revenue.

This part right here makes it laughably simple for these companies to circumvent this law considering so many of these companies are operating at a loss. And it would only takes some creative accounting for them to just barely make just not enough to qualify.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago

Revenue and profit/loss are not the same thing. Revenue only counts the money they bring in BEFORE any expenses or losses, and is used precisely to avoid the issue you raised. That said, it is still possible to get around it, but it's not quite as trivial as just spending more.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If my company made a billion dollars while losing 10 billion dollars, I still had a billion dollars in revenue. I just also happened to piss away 9 more billion dollars than I made.

[–] zlatko@programming.dev 2 points 20 hours ago

Hell, if you did that, you could make a 100 billion IPO, with today's market.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 17 points 1 day ago

"operating at a loss" =/= "low revenue"