this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
258 points (95.4% liked)

politics

30329 readers
2133 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman who previously dated Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said he drunkenly forced her to have sex after she told him to stop, according to a Politico report released Monday, leading prominent supporters to pull their endorsements and throwing a must-win race for the party into turmoil.

Platner denied the allegation, but said he would be considering next steps for his campaign.

“Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we’re taking the time to reflect on the best path forward,” he said in a video released on social media.

Jenny Racicot, who lives in Maine, told Politico that Platner entered her home in 2021 while drunk and assaulted her. Racicot said she had been in an on-and-off relationship with Platner, but she cut off contact with him after that night and told him the incident wasn’t consensual. A voicemail left at a number listed for Racicot seeking comment did not receive an immediate response.

Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to an email and phone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false,” Platner said in his video.

Still, the allegation sparked a flight away from a candidate who has long been controversial. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who’d stood by Platner even as the insurgent candidate was hit with prior allegations, said Monday’s was enough. “I’ve been very clear that sexual assault or violence against women is a red line,” Khanna said. “These allegations are very serious and credible. Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Are you MLs going to exclude all veterans from the revolution then?

Just the ones that go back 4 times for the thrill of killing, volunteer at torture prisons, and work for mercenary groups.

Apparently he can rehabilitate as a veteran but not as a sex pest.

Rapists aren't sex pests, they're rapists.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There are no criminal charges against Platner because there is no evidence to support this story that mysteriously remained silent for 5 years.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Guess we'll see!

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

So only veterans that touch and go with the military for 6 months or 1 tour are worthy of rehabilitation and your support?

Once again, this mentality will never lead to the populist revolution Lenin wrote about.

I'm not here to debate you about what is or isn't a sex pest. Platner can fuck off in that regard.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Charged, tried and convicted in the court of Lemmy.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Uhh, yes. If you don't see the fucking evil way americas military treats innocent civilians on your first tour and then immediately regret it, and actively go back 3 more times, then volunteer for a torture camp, then become a mercenary.. Fuck you.

Not a hard concept to understand, yeah?

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Propaganda can take longer for some if they choose to ignore reality.

Not a lot of leftists are vegans in this regard. If they saw how gas chambers, pistols to the head, knives to the throat are used to kill animals and get them prepped for people's chicken nuggets and jalapen poppers, you'd think they'd change and stop eating meat, but to them the speciesist propaganda that humans are better persists.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Did you write this in the wrong spot? The fuck does this have to do with anything?

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

He gave a straightforward comparison assuming you were capable of reading comprehension and abstract thought.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You know what we did to Germans that were propagandized enough to commit murder, rape and torture?

Hanged them.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Actually we sent most of them home after recruiting the most intelligent and capable and really only hanging token leaders. Most nazis faced no repercussions after the war.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

My point was about propaganda prevailing over people's eyes and ears. That is a fact that happens for many. Not everyone has the privilege to act on their moral instincts like you. That's what I'm saying.

Veganism is an example from another context that underpins what I'm saying. Same can be said for veterans and new recruits. Hell, most Americans still see military people as heroes. Not saying I do, but that's a fact.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Right, and he was there in person to see through the propaganda. He wanted to go back 3 more times. He volunteered to work at a torture dungeon. He became a mercenary. Your point about propaganda is completely irrelevant, this guy is a murderous Nazi rapist.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly I don't think eyes and ears defeat propaganda for all people. I'm happy you believe that. But it might not be a realistic perspective.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 hours ago

Murder. Torture. Rape. If propaganda makes you do these things, you're beyond saving.