United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
How is it not surprising when it contradicts your argument?
Because it allows them to increase their wealth, but the assets and properties are not moving or changing hands (well, they kind of are by moving from holding A to holding B, but the holdings are still entirely within their hands). That's the expensive part which justifies paying experts.
Look I'm not married to this argument about fleeing capital, I don't think it's convincing that everyone will run off to Sweden or whatever. I just think that whatever the solution is will not be the most obvious one that can fit on a t-shirt sold on Gary's merch page. Imo Gary is a grifter and I don't appreciate how he denounces the "academics in their ivory tower" while saying he's got all the answers and it's so important that the prime minister calls him for help.
I don't really know the guy, he just pops up on my feed sometimes, so I have no idea if he's a self important jackass or not. But he raises a lot of important questions with answers we already know to be part of the solution. Raising taxes, destroying inheritance above a certain threshold, the looming threat of extreme Victorian-like inequalities, are all valid points.
Yea I heard the same arguments from people defending Andrew Tate; "he's got a good message about putting in the work to better yourself". My response was always that this is basic life stuff you can get from a thousand other people who aren't sex traffickers. Likewise Gary isn't the first person to talk about these issues, he isn't even the thousandth, he's just the guy who dressed it up with populist messaging and a victim narrative that the elites are trying to silence him.
He has all the hallmarks of being a grifter like the Weinstein brothers, Jordan Peterson, or Tate. Decoding the Gurus have done a few episodes on him being a weirdo that are fun and informative https://youtu.be/Ttrab7AMn-M
Yeah because arguing about taxing the rich to prevent kids dying in the streets from tuberculosis is roughly the same thing as human trafficking or defending social darwinism. What the fuck ?...