185
Ex-girlfriend of Graham Platner says he removed condoms without consent during sex
(www.washingtonpost.com)
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
185 points (91.9% liked)
politics
30356 readers
1812 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When 1 in 4 women have been sexually assaulted and 1 in 6 women have been raped in the US, these accusations do not shock me in the slightest.
It's much more likely that this man with a history of violence took advantage of these women to get what he wanted.
5 in 6 women could be sexually assaulted and I still would hold off passing judgement until there was at least a hearing.
I'm not shocked either. It's seems like that's probably what happened. Again, wild that wanting to hold off judgements until someone gets their day in court should not be controversial lol.
If your excuse is that things can be doctored and faked, then it kinda feels like you've already made up your mind on this. You don't seem like you care what the evidence is.
Like, if you're gonna not care, at least don't be a coward about it. I get that people won't like you, but be more brazen in your misogyny so that people will avoid and dislike you sooner!
Also, just to start a fire for fun, Amber Heard was abused, even if she wasn't a perfect victim. It's pretty well-documented, and Johnny Depp is a piece of shit. I don't like that she returned the abuse, but that happens a lot in abusive relationships.
98% of perpetrators never see a courtroom.
Despite the harm they cause, the vast majority of perpetrators—nearly 98%—are never held fully accountable through the criminal justice system.
Again you're throwing numbers at me when I've already said it's not about the numbers. It's the belief that we should not let accusations be the same as convictions.
When convictions only happen in 2% of cases, we're allowing victims to suffer and perpetrators to walk. Just because an accusation doesn't turn into a conviction doesn't mean rape doesn't happen.
When did I try to say rape doesn't happen? Or that we should allow victims to suffer? Or that perpetrators should walk?
Just say you don't believe women when they come forward with credible rape allegations. If you only ever hold people in judgment when they're taken to court, you are allowing many rapists and predators slide in your opinion. It's your prerogative to do so, but you will be judged for it.
I don't see how that's connected. If 80% of women were sexually assaulted in the USA, I do not believe we should convict and throw someone in jail because they were accused. Even though there's an 80% chance it's true.
I have no idea how you see the world and who you think you are that you think you can "pass judgement" on people when you're perspective is so skewed it's almost 90°.
But I guess that's your perogative.
Holy shit.