News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I honestly struggle to understand how a pool that has been clean for decades suddenly can't be kept clean.
To be fair to the regime (there's something I never thought I'd type) the reflecting pool had been kept clean in the past by paying people (National Park Service workers) to wade out into it and clean it on the regular. Then the DOGE crew laid off a ton of Park Service personnel. Then our dear leader began howling about the green water.
This timeline may imply some details that I've got wrong, but it's hard to be sympathetic to the regime, given the general picture of its priorities it paints, which I believe is generally correct.
Yet another quietly ignored DOGE fuck-up
I mean, I honestly don't like Trump. That said, the pool was originally drinking water, and an Obama era revamp switched it to filtered tidal water. The water that fills it now has way more organic molecules, even with the filtering, leading to algae blooms. The blooms can't really be treated with standard algaecide due to its effect on wild life.
Trump made the situation worse by painting the bottom of the pool. But the reason is was good for decades prior was due to being drinking water, which has far less capability to host life.
Many pools filled with potable (drinking) water grow algae if the chemicals are out of balance. Blaming the water source may seem like the easiest answer, but there are a lot of factors to consider. Here’s a reputable pool website discussing pools with algae problems and how to treat them.
Thanks for the link, but I actually do understand how pools and algae growth functions. I'm a biochemist (or, at least I was), and have been taking care of pools off and on most of my life.
It would be a fuck ton more difficult to manage a pool with tidal water as a source compared to potable water. Its not the only reason the pool has grown more algae, and its still ultimately due to mismanagement during the Trump administration (i.e. not monitoring/managing the algae level and water source). However, ignoring how the switch to tidal water effected the number and frequency of algae blooms is disingenuous.
Are we doing a "blame the right for everything and not attempt to be honest" thing because that is their go-to? I mean, I'm down I guess at this point, but can I get a wink or something when we are doing it?
Anyway, here is an article discussing it: https://cen.acs.org/environment/water/why-the-reflecting-pool-turns-green/104/web/2026/06
I never asserted to “blame the right,” in my argument, just stated that even under ideal conditions algae happens. Your initial assertion was that the tidal water was to blame. I merely stated that the situation is more complex and other factors could be contributing as well.
The article you provided states that algal blooms happened prior to the switch to tidal water, which provides evidence against your initial argument, that tidal water is the cause.
The article you sited is not a scientific evaluation of the reflection pool fails to provide any data on the frequency of algal bloom events, the chemistry of the water, and the impact of the local environment (even if it comes from a reputable source). Scientists are trained in knowing the difference between opinion/hypotheticals and data driven papers.
You eluded to multiple factors in your follow up comment that I agree with, such as frequency of monitoring and overall management. These factors and other potential unknowns could be contributing to the blooms.
You're on lemmy. Of course they are.
Personally, I don't think it should have ever been on drinking water. Moving it off of it was the right move.
I mean, I agree. The changes during the PBA administration made sense and were better for the environment and Washington DC people.
Allegedly
Which part is allegedly?