this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23295 readers
69 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been wondering whether nationalism is inherently a left-wing or a right-wing ideology.

Historically, the answer doesn't seem obvious. During the French Revolution, nationalism was largely associated with the Left. It challenged monarchy, aristocratic privilege, and the old dynastic order by arguing that sovereignty belonged to the nation rather than to a king. In that context, nationalism was a revolutionary and emancipatory force.

Today, though, the picture seems much more complicated.

In many countries, nationalism is primarily associated with the Right: conservative movements, anti-immigration politics, cultural traditionalism, or ethnic conceptions of the nation. Examples could include much of the contemporary European far right or various forms of right-wing populism.

At the same time, there are clearly left-wing nationalist movements. Irish republicanism is probably one of the best-known examples, where nationalism has often been intertwined with socialism, anti-colonialism, and labor politics. Similar patterns can be found in other anti-colonial or national liberation movements.

What's even more interesting is that the same national movement can contain both right-wing and left-wing currents.

Ukraine seems like a good example. There is an explicitly right-wing nationalist current, represented by groups such as Azov and similar organizations, emphasizing military traditions, conservative values, and ethnic nationalism.

But there is also a distinctly left-leaning current of Ukrainian nationalism, often represented by younger activists and parts of civil society. Their understanding of national identity is frequently combined with feminism, LGBTQ rights, decolonial theory, and other progressive ideas. Ukrainian feminism, for example, draws on a long tradition of influential women writers and intellectuals, while decolonial studies have become increasingly important in interpreting Ukraine's relationship with the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union.

Am I missing something here, or is nationalism better understood as a politically neutral framework that can be adopted by both the left and the right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spectre@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

I think this brings us closer to the crux of the issue, but I probably am not gonna be able to take things much farther from here due to my lack of personal knowledge.

There are also examples of this kind of separation within a state itself. The most illustrative case is the Croatian Spring (MASPOK) in Yugoslavia in 1971.

This is interesting, but beyond my knowledge of Yugoslavian history, so we'll have to get into it someday when ive done the reading. It may be a rare occasion where there is a properly socialist split from a socialist country under a nationalist banner.

All I was looking to bring to the discussion is that there are far more counterexamples of reactionary opposition to socialism that utilize nationalism. As discussed in the other thread, there are decolonial/anti-imperial/socialist movements that use nationalism in opposition to capitalism, and that's all well and good.

And ideologically, one can also split from an existing socialist project, as Trotskyists did, although this does not need much explanation since you already know the example.

Definitely, yes, but that falls outside discussions about nationalism, so I wasnt trying to go there.