this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
46 points (100.0% liked)

Games

21346 readers
72 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I have been playing a lot of slay the spire 2, I just passed 200 games and have gotten to around a 70% A10 winrate on every character except ironclad (where I am in the gutter at 30%, how do you play this character if you don't get the vulnerable cards? How do you play the vulnerable cards against aeonglass with 3 artefact?).

I've been entirely on the beta branch for context.

This game fascinates me, it's one of if not the best strategy games I have played. Feedback for most things is extremely salient, you makes a judgement call and then a turn or 2 later you have lost N or N+M health and can evaluate your tactics. The thing that keeps me coming back though is the less salient stuff, the layers and layers of thinking to pathing.

As I improve (I would consider myself approaching mediocre at the game, I think 90% winrate is when you can probably say you are good) I find myself evaluating turns on a much deeper level, asking questions like "the elite that's coming up has a big attack on turn 3, given that and how many skills I play each turn what number should tuning fork be on so that it goes off that turn?"

I think people think of the game as requiring luck but my experience seems to be outside of rare occurrences (like an awful 1-in-a-large-number shuffle against a boss you struggle at) luck is not usually a major factor. If I don't die in the first few floors of act 1 (or reach a state I cannot recover from because I am bad) I usually die on the act 3 second boss.

One of my favourite aspects is how A10 forces you to build for all 3 act 3 bosses, since there is a 2/3 chance you face them. This really tickles your brain to get you to think of how you're going to make your deck do everything it needs to win.

My one criticism of the game is that almost all the interesting enemies are in act 1, although with the recent (oppressive, halp!) changes to infested prism and aeonglass I think that things are on the right track.

If you're into deck builders, or just marvelous strategy games, I unreservedly recommend it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's no wrong way to play with a toy (well unless you hurt people I guess).

I rrally enjoy the challenge of constant improvement, although it took me years to get anywhere decent at slay the spire 1 and mostly played casually.

Defect is a very strong and straightforward character in slay the spire 2. A good one to try next if you're interested in climbing. Statuses with rocket punch are very strong, feral fits there and also supports go for the eyes/beam cell/claw. You have turns like rocket punch for 0, draw deflect and play it, rocket punch again for 0 (if returned by feral) and suddenly you've done 28 damage, drawn 4, and got 6 block for the price of a daze. It can even happen the turn you play feral.

Compact and flak cannon also support status builds, and flak cannon is a hilarious wincon against aeonglass.

I can't get good results with darkness or lightning defect though. I think they could use some support. Although with some bulk up or a lot of frost orbs and slots you can reach for your damage pretty much wherever you can find it.