this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
81 points (90.1% liked)
Not The Onion
21982 readers
588 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Utility and fashion are not the same most times, especially "fashion" shows. These pants are stupid and dangerous and serve no utility purpose other than looking flowy. They could be adjusted to be safe and the light flowy feeling won't go away.
Of course mens fashion is stupid too if its dangerous. I dont discriminat stupid.
Tell me you've never watched a variety of fashion shows without telling me.
You did discriminate by singling out women. You didn't have to punch down like that at all.
I addressed the image. If there were men wearing them in the image or story I would have addressed that too.
Come on, you can't accept you made a generally insensitive and sexist comment and just edit it out or something? You have to double down?
No I can't because it wasn't. I was comparing two dangerous womens garments. You meanwhile haven't provided one dangerous mens garment as a counterpoint.
I'm not debating you on this.
But ypu said
Explain, since you think I was being sexist, provide examples.