this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
231 points (99.1% liked)

Anti Landlords

258 readers
353 users here now

Post anything rental / housing crisis related / just complain about your slumlord/landlord

Interesting:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The clash began after Spring refused to pay a $287 electrician's bill that his landlord forwarded him for the repair of a burnt-out socket in his unit. Shortly after, the landlord notified Spring that his rent would increase by $100 per month.

The jury awarded Spring $16,000 — an amount that Oregon law doubles to $32,000 because of the nature of the violation. On top of that, Spring's attorneys also are entitled to ask a judge to order the landlord to pay all of Spring's legal fees, an amount that currently stands at $225,000.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 71 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

200k in legal fees? What the fuck?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 60 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Landlord probably tried to string it along to force the tenant to settle due to costs.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is the default strategy that I have seen. Civil courts heavily favor flexing resources wih stall tactics.

Very rarely does it pay off for the smaller entity even if they do win, but it's always nice to see when it does.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nah something weird is happening. Most s**tates don't have cost/fee shifting for small claims court and the awards can't usually be higher than 5-7k even when doubled.

[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

It isn't small claims court