this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
343 points (99.1% liked)
Anti Landlords
258 readers
533 users here now
Post anything rental / housing crisis related / just complain about your slumlord/landlord
Interesting:
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Landlord probably tried to string it along to force the tenant to settle due to costs.
This is the default strategy that I have seen. Civil courts heavily favor flexing resources wih stall tactics.
Very rarely does it pay off for the smaller entity even if they do win, but it's always nice to see when it does.
Nah something weird is happening. Most s**tates don't have cost/fee shifting for small claims court and the awards can't usually be higher than 5-7k even when doubled.
It isn't small claims court
Yes the question is why.
As you pointed out, it wasn't a small claim
267 + let's be generous and say a year of rent increase at 100 is 1467. Even if it were two years of rent increase they would still be well into small claim territory. The story doesn't really say how it jumped to 16k, the penalty doubling is fairly common for certain violations so that's not surprising but the amount sure as hell is.
Malicious conduct, which certainly is present here, opens the door to punitive damages which has the potential to be based on vibes alone. Unintentional housing violations are no joke; intentional housing violations are taken very seriously in states where law is respectively.
Well yeah there's a bunch of ways to get there I just find it interesting they chose to leave it out.
Any combination of currently sealed docs/shitty journalism. My guess is squarely mediocrity