this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
212 points (97.7% liked)

Funny

15776 readers
209 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a relative scale. 100 being the baseline.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So a random sample will contain 1.4 times as much coke, for 80% of the cost.

[–] slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not one random sample but the average of all samples.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The random sample collectively.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Presumably 40% less non-coke inclusion. So if before it was 90% coke and 10% cut, it'd be 94/6

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Specifically from around 40-50% to 70-80%.

It's impossible to get more than roughly 85-90% purity as that's the purity they export.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

That makes a lot more sense. Or the quality was originally absolutely terrible.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

What... Is your instance name