Programming

27909 readers

292 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

-23

Ollama vs vLLM vs LightLLM: What Is Technically Different Under the Hood? (www.linkedin.com)

submitted 4 days ago by pylapp@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AstroLightz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What's the difference between the two?

[–] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com 2 points 3 days ago

Here the article that spurred my change: Friends don't let friends use Ollama

Ollama gained traction by being the first easy llama.cpp wrapper, then spent years dodging attribution, misleading users, and pivoting to cloud, all while riding VC money earned on someone else's engine.

He shares that the people behind llama.cpp don't act poorly (at least in those regards). My experience confirms llama.cpp can run just about any gguf while ollama can only run those that have been customized for ollama, and llama.cpp seems faster (no evidence, just anecdotal).