this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

168 readers
18 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/68764163

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because they did discovery and found out he is indeed a googly-eyed chud?

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I have not read the article or anything, but my guess is that you're allowed to insult public figures based on visible things about them without having to face a lawsuit over it because first amendment.

And I'm pretty sure the judge looked at him and was like, "you are a googly-eyed chud". Like, he just told you the truth. You can't sue someone for telling you the truth.