this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

168 readers
23 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/68764163

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because they did discovery and found out he is indeed a googly-eyed chud?

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I have not read the article or anything, but my guess is that you're allowed to insult public figures based on visible things about them without having to face a lawsuit over it because first amendment.

And I'm pretty sure the judge looked at him and was like, "you are a googly-eyed chud". Like, he just told you the truth. You can't sue someone for telling you the truth.

[–] badmancrooks@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago

What a fuckin loser.

[–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Technically he's a Googly-Eyed kremlin bitch, but chud works too

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 days ago

Prove that you aren’t, Kash.

[–] waitingtech@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Cheers!!! to the headline author, this is simply perfection. No notes.