Comradeship // Freechat

2646 readers

74 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml

ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml

Another example that being a genius doesn’t cure bigotry: Noble-Laureate James Watson, co-discoverer of DNA double helix, was a racist and a sexist (archive.ph)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Often celebrated as a pioneer of genetics alongside Francis Crick, racist and sexist remarks tarnished his reputation in later years.

Often celebrated as a pioneer of genetics, allegations of uncredited work and discriminatory and inflammatory remarks cast a shadow over his legacy.

He was accused of making racist and sexist observations and was quoted as favoring genetic engineering to do away with "stupidity" and make "all girls pretty."

The scientist's "legacy in regard to eugenics is complex," Lombardo said. Although Watson helped found an ethics office at NIH and condemned state-sponsored eugenics programs that included forced sterilization, his repeated remarks indicating that racism might be genetically justified tarnished his reputation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 month ago

Is genius even a worthwhile term in the first place? It comes across as in the same space as Great Man Theory to me; putting too much focus on individuals as "exceptional" rather than seeing it more as boiling points being reached out of steadily shifting conditions and contradictions.