this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
123 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

26775 readers
53 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nonexistant because it doesn't have inside-out tracking...

It is existent. It still has outside in tracking, which is processed...on the computer. There's no reason inside out can't be processed the same way.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It would need a massive amount of throughput and latency, try a usb webcam and notice how shit it is, same problem.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're already streaming 2k/144HZ games. They have a massive amount of throughput. They'd have even more if it were wired

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's making use of a one way port, I can't plugin a displayport backwards.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is no port. It's wireless. And it's bidirectional. How do you think the positional data would make it back to the PC if it weren't?

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow it's actually a usb-a port, I don't know how they're sending that much data over it but it's certainly close to its limits, there's a reason most monitors aren't usb and all usb webcams suck

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're talking about the router? Yes. Not only that but it works on usb2.

I don't know how they're sending that much data over it

They're making use of new technology they call foveated streaming. It only streams the content you're looking directly at in full resolution.