this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
1267 readers
171 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As a rule of thumb I consider that petite-bourgoisie are defined as those who are at risk of proletarianisation themsleves if they lose that relationship with capital ie the ability to extact surplus value from the proleteriat.
I would be careful of essentialising classes though. (Individuals of the) Proleteriat could become the petite-bourgoisie and even bourgoisie, and petite-bourgoisie may never become the bourgoisie. The proleteriat may never become bourgoisie but engage in class collaboration against other proleteriat through nationalism. The petite-bourgoisie could collaborate with the proleteriat against the bourgoisie in a national liberation struggle.
(The beauty of dialectics)
Having said there is still an objective reality from which we build praxis from.
(The beauty of materialism)