this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
558 points (94.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

9958 readers
1674 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Most people here are under 40.

Uh huh, uh huh. But you didn't say that at first.

You said:

There's barely a person on Lemmy whose grandma's were more than 15 years old in the early 1940's.

And I'm saying there's plenty of them. Especially since the older you are, the older your grandparents are/would have been then. And I said I'm not even 40. So for those who are 40 and up, their grandparents would likely have been even older.

I just think you exaggerated a bit in your first take, that's all. And that's fine.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

some families just have spread out generations, too. my bio family has 5 generations in the same span my wife's has 4. i'm the second oldest of the grandchildren on my side of the family, my wife is the second youngest of the great-grandchildren on her side of the family.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sure, but 5 generations isn't exactly an average situation. Maybe not even 4. So on average I still maintain my assumption that there are plenty of people here on Lemmy with grandmothers who were older than 15 during the early 40s. ✅

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

5 generations in 120 years is unusual?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought you meant you have 5 generations alive right now. That's unusual. 4 is less unusual but also not the majority, I imagine.

But yeah, that's not what you meant so nevermind. 👍

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

yeah, i realize i was unclear about the period of time originally and that i probably originally implied 4-5 generations since 1945. but my point was less about lengths of specific generations and just that some families reproduce faster.

on my side of the family, currently 4 generations alive but the first of generation 5 is due in about 6 months. my wife's side of the family, there are 3 generations alive, the last of the first generation we're counting will last at most 5 more years and no one's having kids for at least a decade, so it's soon to just be 2 generations alive.

demography is weird.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

7 would be unusual, 4-6 seems normal