Privacy

3192 readers

258 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

488

submitted 2 weeks ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev

A New York subway rider has accused a woman of breaking his Meta smart glasses. She was later hailed as a hero.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I can see an angle when refusal is going to escalate things badly for reasons that could be understood.

Whatever "angle" you see is your mind trying to justify forcefully grabbing someone's property to destroy it.

I don't like surveillance either.

But you can't go around forcefully breaking other people's stuff unless it threatens your well being at that moment.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The thing is, it may actually threaten someone's wellbeing.

Surveillance, especially under a police state, can be a very clear and sometimes immediate threat.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can't legally commit violence based on a hypothetical scenario.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

You can't legally overthrow an oppressive regime, either. Legality is not the same as morality.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ok, but you can't morally attack someone for a hypothetical scenario either.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly. The amount of people here saying “let the cops do it” or saying something about how whatever response is “illegal” is irritating.

[–] lambalicious 7 points 2 weeks ago

unless it threatens your well being at that moment

Which in this case it's doing. Next.