this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
941 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77928 readers
4074 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The HDMI Forum, responsible for the HDMI specification, continues to stonewall open source. Valve's Steam Machine theoretically supports HDMI 2.1, but the mini-PC is software-limited to HDMI 2.0. As a result, more than 60 frames per second at 4K resolution are only possible with limitations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shoshin@aussie.zone 170 points 2 weeks ago (24 children)

Are people just forgetting it has a displayport also? Just ignore HDMI, they got greedy, onto the rubbish pile they go.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 101 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The people who block HDMI for Linux are also the people who make TVs and other media stuff. So you may not be able to use displayport or hdmi just because some rich people decided so to make more profit.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is what I said the other day about this issue. Good luck finding a decent tv with display port! Those fuckers are rare and expensive!

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They are called monitors, and yeah expensive but then you don't get a "Smart TV" with tracking and bullshit.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nor do you get TV tuners. While most geeks probably couldn’t care less, any associated family do prefer to watch Great British Bake-off as it airs.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You could get an external digital tuners and a hdmi switch to switch between pc and the TV.

My grandmother still has an ancient tv with one of those tuner boxes she bought for her tv when analog went off the air.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

My country just disabled radio and tv over coax wire and provider send ip-TV boxes.
This allows to have now faster internet, which I like.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

I would use an Apple TV or a Chromecast in that case. Most TV providers that I know offer their own mediabox anyway, so no need for TV Tuners anymore.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Just told my elderly aunt to not buy a smart tv today!

But do they make 40ish+ monitors?

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago

They do, but they much more expensive than a smart TV, even though they have less components.. Because a Smart TV is sold for less because its providing the vendor access to you as a product to all of their 3rd party partners.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I will add that you can also still get Westinghouse dumb TVs with included DVD player and USB video player, 3x HDMI and a tuner, but 1080p and Max 36"

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is big! Where can I buy one for my aunt‽ She needs a dumb TV that integrates with the Westinghouse infrastructure.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is the one I've gotten two of for kids playroom and bedroom.. They work great, old school simple tech.

https://www.amazon.ca/Westinghouse-Parental-Controls-Non-Smart-Monitor/dp/B09QXYZB3Y

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

No, my name is Chris.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter if you get one. They are the cheapest and best image quality TVs available, and many like Samsung's let you set them up without connecting to Wi-Fi.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Basically no modern TV has displayport except for few that come with USB-C

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

DisplayPort to HDMI adapters are quite cheap and don't add latency.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aside from practicality, might there be something that gets lost if you do this? (e.g. worse frame rate, quality or sth. else)

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, DisplayPort, DVI-D and HDMI use fundamentally the same protocol, HDMI just adds DRM which requires active adapters when one plugs in a HDMI source into a DisplayPort sink. DisplayPort to HDMI conversions are completely lossless and don't add latency AFAIK.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, all that hassle just for some DRM, as if that would prevent anything... Thanks for clarifying 👍

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, but forget about VRR unless you want to flash a custom firmware and with that the adapter is finky as hell. I use one for 2 years now. It kinda works

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem is that many TVs have HDMI, but no DP.

[–] AshLassay@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Then buy a DP to HDMI 2.1 dongle

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No problem for me, but many consumers don't think that far.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What we want is a solution for customers who don't understand the benefit of DP and won't buy an adapter when there's already HDMI ports on both devices.

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't an HDMI to DP cable work then?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It probably would, but that is already to complicated for most people.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not if Valve packed it in with the Steam Machine.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That would be a nice idea, indeed.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not really how it works given that so many devices have HDMI ports.

If we expect to make hardware devices that are generally compatible with interfaces non-technical users use, then excluding an entire class of common modern interface spec isn't a great choice.

It'll be fine for now but as the specs bump up inversion and HDMI changes over time is just going to get worse

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

but as the specs bump

Eh, 4k is already at the point of diminishing returns. There are 8k displays for a while now, but nobody buys them.

Rather, create 5k, please.

[–] TotalCourage007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I wish game devs knew how to optimize for storage better. Let me install HD instead of 4k games if I choose. I do the same thing for anime series because HD barely takes up any space at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anon 3 points 2 weeks ago

VRR? HDMI-CEC?

[–] biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ok but I need a pretty expensive active adaptor for my tv?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)