this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
478 points (89.6% liked)

196

5075 readers
2701 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Major health experts agree that well-planned vegetarian and vegan diets are healthy. For example, a 2025 position paper from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics states that “appropriately planned vegetarian and vegan dietary patterns can be nutritionally adequate and can offer long-term health benefits”. Harvard Health (citing the American Dietetic Association) likewise notes that such diets are “healthful, nutritionally adequate” and can help prevent chronic diseases. In fact, plant-based eating is even included as a recommended healthy pattern in recent U.S. dietary guidelines.

Research shows real health gains on plant-based diets. Mayo Clinic reports that vegetarians (when they eat a variety of foods) often have lower risk of heart disease, diabetes and certain cancer. Large cohort studies confirm this: one pooled analysis of over 76,000 people found vegetarians had about 25% lower heart-disease mortality than meat-eaters. These benefits make sense because vegetarians tend to eat less saturated fat and more fiber, vitamins and antioxidants, leading to lower LDL cholesterol, blood pressure and BMI – all factors linked to longevity.

All key nutrients can be covered without meat. Proteins, iron, calcium and healthy fats are abundant in plants: beans, lentils, nuts, soy and whole grains supply ample proteinhealth.harvard.edu (even vegans meet protein needs by eating diverse plant foods). Iron can be obtained from legumes and greens (with vitamin C-rich foods to boost absorption), and calcium from leafy greens or fortified plant milks. Omega-3 fats (ALA) are in flaxseed and walnuts, and algal or fortified foods can provide EPA/DHA if needed. Vitamin B₁₂ is the one nutrient not found in plant foods naturally, but health experts point out that vegans simply use fortified foods or a low-cost B₁₂ supplement to meet the requirement. With these adjustments (which many omnivores also make, e.g. vitamin D or fish-oil supplements), a plant-based diet easily meets nutritional needs at any age.

Finally, plant-based diets aren’t just a privileged fad – they’re common worldwide. For instance, roughly 39% of Indian adults say they are vegetarian, and many cultures eat mostly plant foods Vegetarian and vegan eating is growing (millions of Americans now follow these diets) and is explicitly endorsed by public health authorities as sustainable and healthy.

[–] Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One, as you said it require properly planned meals, which you seem to understate the actual difficulty of that. I can tell you right now, I would have a bitch of a time factoring that level of meal planning into my life. Secondly, while supplements are something you can do, it is not accessible to everyone. Thirdly, allergies complicate things as well, furthering the need for suppliments.

Vitamin b12 deficiency is quite prevalent in both those in a low socioeconomic status, but also vegans and vegetarian. So clearly this is an issue facing vegans despite supplements. Likely due to supplements not being as accessible as you are letting on. Supplements would especially be more inaccessible if everyone became vegan or vegetarian. Hence why I said veganism and vegetarianism require serious scientific and logistical innovation to make possible.

I am also not too keen on centralizing more power to pharma companies. Do we seriously want to take autonomy away from poor regions as they become even more dependent on major pharma companies in the first world so they can get their daily b12 and other vitamins cause of the ethics of meat consumption?

I also genuinely do believe if any ethical issues with harming animals can be extended to plants and fungi. They are able to sense, communicate, and think. Just in very different ways than animals. Fungi particularly are fascinating regarding this. I do not think just because they exhibit that differently means they're life should be ignored.

You also need to realize we domesticated a bunch of animals, and we would need to decide what to do with thwm. You just gonna release all those animals in the wild? Animals that have become entirely reliant on humans to survive. Or do we kill every one of them? Either way we are sentencing them to death.

And so I say again, just because something is unethical, doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't do it. And just because you can do it, doesn't mean you shouldn't do it in the most ethical way you can. If you are able to live as a vegetarian, or even vegan, go ahead. I encourage it. But I do not think it is reasonable or realistic to expect it to become a world standard. Lets take it one battle at a time and work to make the harm we do as ethical as we can realistically do now.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think you overestimate the difficulty of it, especially for vegetarianism where you can get all you need from eggs and dairy. Anecdotally I have been vegetarian for 2 years and have never taken supplements and am very healthy, just ran a half marathon in 1:40 which wouldn't be possible if I was anemic from b12 deficiency. An even larger example is the hundreds of millions of Indians who are vegetarians and have been for millennia, long before supplements existed.

You also underestimate the difficulty in a meat based diet. Every diet requires planning and intentionality to make it healthy. Meat based diets require you to pay far more attention to the amount of fiber you're getting. Because of this many people who eat meat are not getting enough fiber, 95% of Americans, which leads to intestinal issues and cancers, which is why vegetarians tend to have better health outcomes as noted above since their main source of protein, legumes, are also high in fiber.

As for the efficiency and accessibility it takes far less resources to make b12 with bacteria then with cows/chickens. It wouldn't take any logistical or scientific innovation to do it either, we know how to make it with bacteria, and it is far more shelf stable and transportable than meat. In general meat production is extremely wasteful and destructive putting aside the ethical arguments. Cows are one of the top sources of greenhouse gases and the demand for them is causing vast tracts of the Amazon to be burned to create new pasture land. If you ask any environmentalist worth there salt what's the best thing you can do for the planet they'll say eat less/no meat and drive less/not at all.

How is big pharma less trustworthy than big agriculture? The meat industry is extremely consolidated. Also b12 isn't patented and the methods to produce it are widely available, there's no reason it could only be produced in the first world.

For the ethical argument it is valid and depends on your own ethics / philosophy of whether plants / fungi suffer and feel pain. Either way though eating meat is still worse because cows , chickens etc. eat plants to produce meat. Due to trophic loss they consume far more calories and nutrients from plants then they produce in meat, thus killing more plants then is necessary to feed a human. If you want to minimize plant suffering then you should be vegan.

For the existing cows, I'm not advocating for, nor entertaining the absurd idea of outlawing meat eating tomorrow and having to deal with current stock. The cows that are already here are for the most part already doomed to a life of suffering, the best we can do is stop breeding them so we don't bring more suffering into the world. The best way to stop that from happening is lowering meat consumption which will cause meat producers to stop breeding to deal with the lower demand.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lowering meat consumption which will cause meat producers to stop breeding to deal with the lower demand.

this has never happened

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

It presumably would've happened in ancient India as vegetarianism started catching on and cows became sacred.

Even if it didn't, we've never reduced our fossil fuel consumption on a global scale either, that doesn't mean it's impossible or that it isn't something we should / have to do.

[–] Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You make good points, and I overall agree with you. Although I don't believe we need to stop farming animals . I think we can continue farming them for stuff like eggs, milk, wool, etc and do it in ethical ways. What are your thoughts of meat from end of life animals?

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I agree that continuing to farm animals ethically solely for the excess products they produce is an achievable, sustainable and ethical goal we should strive for.

If the meat would be wasted anyway then it's fine to eat. Better us eat it then the maggots. The goal shouldn't be to just stop people from eating meat, it should be to reduce the amount of animals being bred to serve our taste. If a farmer can only sell the meat after the animal has lived a long life, eating a lot of food that they have to provide, they'll be less likely to breed them as it wouldn't be profitable.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I actually stopped taking B12 supplements, because there was already enough in my food that the supplement was an overload, and so I was getting acne breakouts.

Cattle are also given B12 supplements, because pasture land gets depleted of cobalt after enough grazing. Meat eaters usually get their B12 second hand from a cow pill. I get most of mine from nutritional yeast (Great savory stand in for dry cheeses like parmesan).

Calcium is actually the biggest concern for me, because most meat eaters get their calcium from calcium-fortified non-vegan foods. So that's the one and only supplement pill I take that most meat eaters wouldn't.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Vitamin B₁₂ is the one nutrient not found in plant foods naturally

that's not true. vitamin A, for example.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is in fact a whole array of vitamins and nutrients that are not produced by plants or animals but rather by the microbes living in or around those plants and animals.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can get vitamin a from carotene which is common in a lot of foods, notably carrots. Even if it wasn't , same with b12, this is the 21st century, we can synthesize any vitamin , either chemically or with bacteria, without harming animals.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you don't get it: you synthesize it. and not everyone is good at that

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

No but a vast majority of people can, so vitamin a deficiency is not a concern for the millions of people living healthily on plant based diets. And again for those that aren't able to synthesize it they can take synthesized retinol supplements without needing to eat meat.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but, to be clear, plants don't have vitamin a, so your claim that the only nutrient they don't have is B12 is wrong. and you seem to know it was incorrect, meaning you lied.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The term "vitamin A" encompasses a group of chemically related organic compounds that includes retinol, retinyl esters, and several provitamin (precursor) carotenoids, most notably β-carotene (beta-carotene)

I didn't lie, all the articles I read and my understanding when I posted the first comment was that b12 was the only vitamin you can't get from a plant based diet. Most of the articles don't mention vitamin a because the precursor is common and it is not a concern for the great majority of people on plant based diets. Your comment made me research further to discover that carotene is technically just a precursor.

Your resorting to pedentry to avoid trying to refute the fact that most dietary experts agree that a plant based diet can be just as healthy, if not more so then a diet with meat.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Your resorting to pedentry

I'm correcting misinformation

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

b12 and vitamin a aren't the only nutrients, either

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

a 2025 position paper from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

updated from all previous versions to no longer discuss infants, or women who are pregnant or nursing. but the paper does go on to detail all the risks of a vegan diet.