this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
615 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

9944 readers
3041 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They said they it’s a Citrix thing. They are getting rid of Citrix too, which is fine as it’s a pain in the ass, but moving to full PCs for remote workers tha don’t need them is a ridiculous waste of time and money, especially now. It’s just going to make things worse because supporting that won’t scale as cleanly.

And why this migration? It’s not like Citrix was a bad idea on the first place. It actually solves some real problems for us.

IT: “because we can’t remote into a Citrix box.” Me: “the fuck you cant.”

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

because we can’t remote into a Citrix box

Citrix literally makes a tool for doing exactly that! Its called Citrix Director and while yes it's just as slightly-not-quite-wonky as everything else Citrix, it works quite well for remoting into a thin client's session among other management features

They said they it’s a Citrix thing.

Pretty sure it's more of a redirected folder thing with Windows, but Windows has been pretty wonky recently about redirected folders and profiles. By memory of my last Citrix environment redirecting the recycle bin is completely possible but bad practice since it's just more profile data to fling around and slow down login times