this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
290 points (93.9% liked)

Would You Rather

926 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to c/WouldYouRather, where we present you with the toughest, most ridiculous choices you never knew you had to make! Would you rather have a third arm that's only useful for picking your nose, or be able to talk to animals but only if they're wearing hats? Yeah, it's that kind of vibe. Come for the absurdity, stay because you've clearly got nothing better to do with your life.

Rules:

  1. Follow dbzer0 rules.
  2. Start posts off with "WYR:"

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 91 points 5 days ago (6 children)

30s per day of mild-to-moderate discomfort for 5 years, or working an average of 6 hours per day for virtually my entire life.

This was clearly written by someone with an intense and irrational fear of the sea. Nothing's doing shit to you in 30 seconds. Most creatures wouldn't even register your presence quickly enough to even think about doing anything.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Especially the surface of the open ocean. There's little out there compared to near land. And even if you happened to pop near a shark feeding frenzy, for 30 seconds hold your breath, let yourself sink if that happens, and just don't move at all.

As written it's just five years 365 times. The odds are very good for survival. To make it more questionable, have the owed time be five years total in your life of 30 seconds accumulated. Still the same factors apply, 30 seconds isn't a life risk. Add in the choice of extending any of these to longer than 30 seconds before the pop to use up the time. Now survival becomes questionable if you gamble too much or at the wrong time.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

To make it more questionable, have the owed time be five years total in your life of 30 seconds accumulated.

Unless my math is wrong, which is super possible cuz I’m not particularly skilled with math, this isn’t possible. I just looked up seconds in a day and did a couple quick divisions (86,400 seconds in a day, divide by 30 for the number of swims, then divide by 365 for number of years it would take). So might be way off.

A single day in that arrangement appears to take almost 8 (7.89) years of daily 30-second swims. You’d never reach 5 years, it would just be a permanent condition of your life at that point. You might accumulate an entire fortnite before you die if you start very young (14 days would be 110.5 yrs).

Edit to fix number

Nods. Don’t forget you get 50 skip days. 50. I’d burn a couple of those if I was in the middle of something at end up with like 47 left.

I like swimming in the middle of nowhere. 30 seconds wouldn’t be enough for the absolute tranquility…I mean…if you weren’t in the middle of a storm, which would be also fine for 30 seconds.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

And most creatures are near shore or too deep to matter.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

I mean, it would be extremely possible to be exceedingly uncomfortable to dangerous.

You could end up in the middle of a group of jellyfish, on a shoreline with heavy waves crashing you against rocks, in glacial Antarctic waters, on top of barnacle-covered rocks cutting your feet, in front of a ship barreling down upon you, in an oil spill... the entire premise is that it's random. Many teleports would be safe, but any might not be.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I personally think the stress over not knowing and having to do it every day and trying to keep it secret too would be way worse for me than just working.

You probably get used to it over time though.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 days ago

I've survived far worse.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago

There are so many ways you can die in less than 30s in the ocean. And that's just on the surface. The offer is "into the ocean".