this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
622 points (80.9% liked)

memes

18551 readers
4145 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nostrauxendar@lemmy.world 155 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

While I think these apps are exploitative on both sides (exploiting laziness/convenience and exploiting workers), I think implying that people who use delivery services are racist, classist, or both, is a very "internet" thing to do.

Perhaps it would be healthy if OP went outside for Christmas. A little walk in the real world, as opposed to Lemmy or Twitter or Bluesky, might help rebalance things.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Consider folks with disabilities or those who don't own cars. I really don't see the problem of a delivery service like DoorDash or UberEats that would pay its workers a living wage.

The reason those are unethical is that they don't treat their workers as employees, and don't pay enough. If someone started a generic-delivery service that used employed workers that are paid a living/thriving wage, didn't request tips, had set fees, had customer service reps, and maybe had workers wear cams while on the shift as a security measure... would that not be worth supporting?

[–] nostrauxendar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Hey, I totally agree with you.

The concept behind these apps is fine, even helpful. I've used these types of apps when I've been unwell and couldn't get to the shops. I'm not forgetting people who are disabled. I don't own a car.

I agree, an app that provided a similar service that took care of its employees would be fine. An app that provided a similar service without jacking the prices up massively and pushing junk food would be great.

I know and agree with you that the poor treatment and underpayment of workers is a problem.

Yes, of course your alternative app would be worth supporting.

We do not seem to be in any disagreement here.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If we all stop using the app, does it benefit these gig workers?

[–] verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone 39 points 2 days ago

No, but the social conditions that allow the gig economy to even exist hurts gig workers. As usual, a systemic issue is being framed as a matter of consumer choice.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

am I at lemmy meme.ml? lol