this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
63 points (86.2% liked)
Showerthoughts
38785 readers
844 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, if I forget everything in the next life, that won't be me any more. In a sense, I would be permanently gone regardless of whether it's technically the same soul.
How do explain this.
Say you had a trumatic childhood experience and repress all your memories before age 12. Did you "die" at age 12? Were your "reborn" at age 12?
"You" is like this camera that records things. If you swap out the SD card, is it still the same camera?
Your "soul" is the camera, the SD card is your brain.
Get what I'm saying?
Repressed memories from trauma still leave subconscious changes in behaviour, though.
If I lost all my memories until the age of 12 and no trace of any habit or thought remained, then yes. Whoever I used to be died.
I am my brain and the memories it contains. I am the SD card.
I don't like the idea that "memory = identity"
Memory is part of you, but doen't solely define you.
If someone made an identical clone of you, like every atom and molecule, even the neurons. Is that "you"? Did you split into 2?
If we then destroy the original, are "you" still "alive". I mean someone has the exact same memories, same atoms.
That's just Ship of Theseus and can't be defined.
I'm not made of the same atoms and molecules as I was a decade ago. Some of them might be still around, but it's mostly completely new particles. Am I still the same person I was a decade ago? If not, how come I can claim ownership of stuff some other guy with the same name bought back then?
I think I've read that on the quantum level you actually can't make the exact same configuration of particles and energy levels in two places at the same time. Trying to create a copy of an object (or, in general, any configuration of particles) would inevitably cause the original to cease to exist. But it's also mostly a thought experiment, as we can't do that with more than a few quantum particles at a time.
So far, as best as humanity is able to tell, your memories are you. If we ever get to Star Trek style teleportation, maybe we can define that more rigourously.
Quick edit: I am quite enjoying this debate, though - interesting to hear other people's takes on identity, soul and all that stuff.
You aren’t your brain, your brain and body are completely apart from you and don’t care what you’d like. If you were your brain you could stop beating your heart at will, stop digesting, stop or start functions that you are in control of. You’re not in control of anything; not even what you are seeing. Just your perspective and what you make of those experiences. Also, the change in behavior is also mostly up to your body and brain; not you. If you’re hungry, your judgement is clouded and skews towards the negative, not because that is your want.
If I was completely in control of my identity, I could stop being bisexual at will. Not a very compelling argument.
Sorry, where did I say you were?
Actually, you and I are saying the same thing. There isn’t a lot you control about yourself. Did you even read the argument in question?
Your argument - if I understood it correctly - was that I'm not my brain because I'm not in complete control of my brain. But then I'm not in complete control over what most people would agree is part of my identity.
Well, you aren’t. You didn’t chose most things about yourself, you just think you did as to not cause existential crisis. Your favorite foods, your sexuality, what you think is funny, what smells like perfume and what smells like poop; all has very little to do with anything you consciously chose. Most of the things I mentioned are decided before you’re born.
That is true. But it also doesn't prove that I'm not defined by my brain and memories. I didn't chose to have most of my memories either.
I agree with you, but the memories you keep at the forefront aren’t your choice either. You tend to remember the negative moments more vividly because your brain is trying to protect you from experiencing it again. A useful tactic in times past, but not so much anymore. I’m not saying you’re not you- you are. There is a you apart from your body and mind, but it is much much less than people would like to realize. It’s more like you’re a ghost in the machine. You think you’re the driver but you’re really just the passenger that gets to say where to stop every so often, but not consistently.
Ah, that is a take I can understand. I can't say I completely agree, but thanks for clarifying!
Ultimately the difference between our arguments is just vibe-based, I think. I don't feel like there's a "ghost in the machine" outside of my brain, but, again, it's just a personal subjective feeling.
The way I see it, it’s a reason to be kinder to yourself for things you are prone to do, or behaviors you’re not fond of. Maybe you can “train” yourself to be different, but you aren’t who put it there and shouldn’t judge yourself for the person you are.
I’m glad I was able to clear it up! I actually love talking philosophy; so thank you for giving me a chance to do that today.
Shelly Kagan has the best reasoning about souls I've seen so far, he makes a pretty compelling case that we have no soul. I recommend this playlist to everyone, it's so good :
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEA18FAF1AD9047B0