this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
18 points (87.5% liked)
Git
4059 readers
6 users here now
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
Resources
Rules
- Follow programming.dev rules
- Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
- No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.
Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
you don't have to rebase.
create a new branch from main
push it
go to main
git reset --hard origin/main@Vulwsztyn yeah, "there are multiple ways to fix a mistake" is not the point, dude!
Besides which, yes I do have to rebase if I already have a topic branch for what I'm working on, and didn't pay attention to which branch I'm on.
I almost never want to commit to the main branch, only merge from a topic branch. So that means that having confirmation before committing to it is useful.
@JackbyDev yes, friend, you too have entirely missed the point.
I have my branch displayed in my shell, but mistakes happen. And a pre-commit hook that checks what branch I'm on is an excellent way to avoid those mistakes.
I already have a topic branch, likely with a half a dozen odd commits in, which I intended to make my changes in. The hook avoids a mistake made on the one branch I know I pretty much never want to commit to directly.
Yes, I could continue making commits to the wrong branch, and then fix my mistake later. That's noooot the point! I want to commit to the right branch in the first place. Yes, I'm going to need to rebase eventually before I push and put up a merge request - also not the point. The point of the topic branch is that all my work in progress commits are there, I can see the history of what I've tried that has and hasn't worked, and then eventually clean it up with a rebase before actual submission.
All the work neds to go in the topic branch, always, and it already exists because I opened it as soon as I started work on that ticket.
I'm confused how this even happens. You switch to dev and then choose to keep working on your ticket, but your previous work isn't there, so how do you keep progressing? I can see this as an edge case, but it happens to you often enough that a pre commit hook is useful to stop it?
To be clear, I don't care what you do, if it works, it works, I just am having a difficult time understanding how this particular scenario happened enough that a pre commit hook was the best way to solve it.
@JackbyDev well, it doesn't happen very frequently, it's more of a nice-to have.
It's more of an issue because our product has a lot of totally separate sections, as well as a separate companion app. It's easy enough to work on an issue without ever touching code affected by another, and for whatever reason have two or three issues in progress, each in their own branch.
Say, some task you're blocked on, in the meantime some minor issue from five years ago that nobody really cares about that much but would be nice, and then some other unrelated cleanup task as well.
But, even when I used to work at a place where there was only one single-purpose app, I still worked in topic branches and never ever wanted to actually commit to main (through the mistake was less likely to happen, I grant).