101
Developers remain willing but reluctant to use AI: The 2025 Developer Survey results are here
(stackoverflow.blog)
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
101 points (99.0% liked)
Programming
24141 readers
467 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At my job, I have found it useful generating mediocre frontends under extremely tight time constraints. Clients are happy with the outcome and I find it more easily customizable than WordPress.
Looking at the code though, it's not a good idea to use it to build anything complex. Best it can do is "Company X needs ANY website before their presentation tomorrow." or whatever.
In other words, it's OK at covering for poor to nonexistent planning.
I'd like to run a model locally and experiment with it though. Problem is it seems no one discloses how they trained their models, open source or not.
If anyone has any suggestions, I'm open. I see Tabby has a Neovim plugin, but, again, no idea what it's trained on.
I have not looked into these myself yet, but Apertus is supposed to be fully open: https://programming.dev/post/36791696
And I recently heard of StarCoder, which was also said to be like that and which is optimized for coding assistance: https://github.com/bigcode-project/starcoder