this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
447 points (97.9% liked)

hmmm

7899 readers
20 users here now

For things that are "hmmm".

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not exactly unique to the US justice system, it's a pretty common issue in western democracies.

You're very right that this is really bad psychologically and also stupidly expensive, but it's a hard issue because you also need to be diligent to avoid wrongful convictions, which are also really bad psychologically (real perpetrators get off free, and law-abiding people lose faith in the system even more).

[–] greenskye@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think there could be a better balance between taking time to get all the facts straight and taking immediate action to halt ongoing harm. The fact that the government can basically out sprint legal consequences because we have very few mechanisms to stop them in the moment is a problem.

We can stop a shooter or other violent criminal in the moment, but a more nebulous crime, like what most powerful and rich people commit is almost always left unchecked until long after it's already over and done with.

It's just another aspect of the class war really. The system handles poor criminals really well and is nearly useless in holding the rich accountable or stopping their crime sprees.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i mean, while you take the time to get all the facts straight you potentially imprison the innocent. there's layers to this onion

[–] greenskye@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Something we already do for poor people. Violent criminals get held all the time and an arrested criminal waiting trial going out and committing even more crimes would result in jail without a bond option or one so high for that individual they'd never afford it.

If we applied the same logic to the rich, they'd be arrested, held for awhile, maybe released on bond depending on circumstances (which would probably be in the hundreds of millions or even billions to be equivalently painful to them). Then if they went out and did the same crimes again, they'd be locked up pending their trial, possibly with a new bond that's set at something totally absurd like 50 trillion dollars.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is strictly a matter of the courts not being expanded and growing at the same rate as the rest of society. The only reason it takes so long to get your case through the court system is not because of technical complexity but because the courts are not equipped to deal with the volume of cases they need to process. We need more courts, more prosecutors, judges, lawyers, and clerks- not more cops.

[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah but those fields take training 🙃