That's going toward exactly my point, though. The fear of guns is doing WAY more than the guns are
stevestevesteve
Sued for what
This move has been incredibly unpopular with his most loyal followers
Any source for that? I'm very curious who is most loyal followers are and what they have to say about it
What the fuck is this world. What a garbage fucking take to call that offensive
Looks like tripod equipment, either for photography or some other type of common thing. Some mics, video cameras, etc use that kind of mounting
I really want to know how much guns are actually affecting these kids, with differentiation against media fear mongering of guns. I know even asking the question that way makes my point obvious but it's something that DEEPLY interests me and always has
I'm only more confused
Find me a dumb tv anywhere near the performance+size+price of a mid-to-high end smart TV right now. I can find some monitors but they're not well reviewed, not readily available to consumers, not meeting the same specs for e.g. HDR, wide gamut, or otherwise, while being wildly more expensive.
This is not a failure of the consumer. There is no way to vote with your money if you're looking for a good TV.
What a fucking moron along with all his voters
Is that nail polish?
Creating diseases sounds horrendous but I haven't read the article yet
For images with large blocks of solid colors and no gradients, frequently the opposite is true. Screenshots and avatars with solid(transparent) backgrounds are often smaller as png.
It drives me nuts seeing things like tweets (white and black text) being shared with crazy jpeg artifacting. They'd be so much smaller and so much less ugly as png